close

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27465254

2016 Sep;42(9):1071-81. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000832.

Filler Rhinoplasty Evaluated by Anthropometric Analysis.

玻尿酸注射有助於鼻形的改善(客觀測量)

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

There are no reports of objectively evaluating the efficacy of filler rhinoplasty by anthropometric techniques.

OBJECTIVE:

To objectively demonstrate the effectiveness of filler rhinoplasty by anthropometric analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

A total of 242 patients who revisited the clinic within 2 months of undergoing hyaluronic acid filler rhinoplasty were analyzed based on the injection site, injected volume, and the change in anthropometry.

RESULTS:

Among the 242 patients, 112 (46.3%) were in the nasal dorsum augmentation group, 8 (3.3%) were in the tip rotation group, and 122 (50.4%) were in the whole nose augmentation group. Average injection volume was 1 ± 0.4 mL for nasal dorsum and 0.9 ± 0.3 mL for tip rotation, whereas 1.6 ± 0.5 mL was used for whole nose augmentation. On follow-up, the radix height, nasofrontal angle, and nasolabial angle (NLA) had increased by 78.3%, 5.7 ± 4.1°, and 9.4 ± 4.5°, respectively, whereas the modified nasofacial angle had decreased by 1.9 ± 2.9°. Three cases (1.2%) of vascular complications were encountered.

(46.3%的人打山根, 3.3%的人打鼻尖, 50.4%打整個鼻子, 山根平均注射的量為1 ± 0.4 mL, 修飾鼻尖用量大約 0.9 ± 0.3 mL, 整個鼻子大約1.6 ± 0.5 mL, 整體來說山根增加了78.3%的高度)

CONCLUSION:

Filler rhinoplasty is a simple and effective treatment modality producing outcomes comparable with surgical augmentation rhinoplasty. Among various anthropometric measurements, the nasal radix height was the most useful for evaluating dorsum augmentation, whereas the NLA was the best for nasal tip rotation.(結論: 玻尿酸隆鼻是個安全有效的方式)

PMID:
27465254
DOI:
10.1097/DSS.0000000000000832
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
推薦大容診所推薦大容診所推薦大容診所推薦大容診所推薦大容診所推薦大容診所推薦大容診所推薦大容診所
arrow
arrow
    文章標籤
    玻尿酸隆鼻
    全站熱搜

    beauty9999 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()